MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220936872 · doi:10.18280/ts.390141

Detection, Estimation and Radiation Formation Using Smart Antennas for the Spatial Location

2022· article· en· W4220936872 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Feroz Morab, Rajeshwari Hegde, Veena N. Hegde

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Education, India
KeywordsBeamformingDirection of arrivalComputer scienceTransmission (telecommunications)Smart antennaSpace-division multiple accessAntenna (radio)Angle of arrivalElectronic engineeringAntenna arrayBase stationReal-time computingDirectional antennaTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Electromagnetic (EM) waves are impinging on the base station from all the directions, Equally Spaced Uniform Linear Antenna Array (ESULA) are used to process these incoming EM waves to Detect and Estimate the directions of the mobile transmitters. After the process of Detection and Estimation, Electronic Beamforming is used to provide the narrow sharper beam towards the detected user. This Detection, Estimation and Beamforming plays a key role in variety of use cases like Radar, Wireless Communication and Sonar based systems. Smart Antenna Systems are implemented using two strategies namely Direction of Arrival (DoA) and Beamforming (BF). Direction of Arrival is a mechanism of Detecting and Estimating the directions of the mobile transmitters. Beamforming on the other hand is a process of transmission of the EM waves towards the source in a specific direction and providing the Spectral Nulls to other Interfering users. To increase the user capacity and to enhance the user experience Spatial Location based Spatial Division Multiple Access (SDMA) technology is used. To improve the overall performance of the smart antenna systems energy and packet delivery is majorly focused on specific source directions rather than using blind transmission strategy. In this paper performance analysis of algorithms for Direction of Arrival methods as well as the Beamforming methods have been performed. Experimental simulations are conducted and comparison is done with respect to Bias, Resolution and Time complexity for the Direction of Arrival methods. Noise Subspace Method (NSM) DoA algorithm consistently delivered the optimal bias, high resolution detection of the user location in spatial domain and provided lesser time complexity for both the scenarios which uses fewer antenna elements or larger number of antenna array elements at the base station. Similarly for the case of Beamforming methods the Mean Square Error and Beam-directions have been compared.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicAntenna Design and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207