MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4220947348 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu22-10408

Detecting hotspots of ecosystem change with remote sensing across the Arctic

2022· preprint· en· W4220947348 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stefano Potter, Arden Burrell, Kevin Butler, Charlie Frye, S. Natali, Brendan M. Rogers, Tatiana A. Shestakova, Anna- Maria Virkkala, Jennier Watts

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceClimate changeEcosystemHotspot (geology)Vegetation (pathology)ArcticGlobal warmingPrecipitationPhysical geographyClimatologyGeographyEcologyOceanographyGeologyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Arctic region is warming faster than elsewhere on Earth, at a rate nearly twice the global average. This warming is expected to negatively impact vegetation, hydrology, terrain thaw, and many other ecosystem properties. Here we identify primary hotspots of landscape changes occurring across the Arctic using multiple observations from reanalysis and satellite remote sensing, spanning visible, near-infrared, and thermal infrared (VIS-NIR-TIR) and microwave bands. This suite of VIS-NIR-TIR and microwave-derived products allows for the longer-term monitoring of ecological indicators for climate (e.g., temperature and precipitation), landscape surface frozen status, ecosystem water stress, and vegetation. Specifically, we examined “hotspots” (i.e., Getis-Ord Gi* statistics) and associated rates of change in thermal state, including near-surface air temperature; annual start and length of the surface non-frozen period; soil thaw depth. To identify regional changes in wetness, we examined hotspots of change and trends in precipitation; snow cover; surface water inundation; soil moisture status. For vegetation, we examined VIS-NIR greenness indices; annual start date and length of growing season; history of disturbance (i.e., fires). Lastly, we examined higher (30 m) resolution Landsat and Sentinel 2 imagery and in situ observations to better understand the drivers of change and the potential impacts to local communities and infrastructure. Our hotspot analysis indicated the most severe changes occurring in the Russian Far East, the Northwest Territories of Canada, and portions of Alaska including the North Slope. Specifically, the Northwest Territories have experienced warming, greening and wetting while the Russian Far East has experienced large temperature increases, an increase in permafrost active layer thickness, and a potential lengthening of the non-frozen season (as indicated by the classification of the ground surface state by microwave remote sensing). The North Slope of Alaska has experienced increasing temperatures, precipitation and a decrease in the number of frozen days per year. Information obtained through this remote sensing analysis, integrated into a geographic information system, can be used to better support decision making for land management and risk assessments across the rapidly warming Arctic-boreal region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClimate change and permafrost→French-language works237,207→