Experimental investigation of subsurface defect detection in concretes by infrared thermography and convection heat exchange
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Infrared thermography (IRT) is a non-destructive technique capable of detection and localisation of hidden subsurface defects in components of transportation infrastructure, such as concrete bridges, thereby contributing to structural health monitoring (SHM). Addressing the lack of research on subsurface defect detection in concretes by convection heat exchange, and regarding the importance of laboratory studies for proper implementation of IRT, this paper presents results from recent laboratory investigations of IRT on concrete slabs with simulated hidden defects using a convective thermal excitation mechanism. The concrete slabs in this study had simulated defects ranging 5–25 mm in depth from the surface. These studies show the effect of initial temperature, heating/cooling process, temperature range and defect depth on thermal contrast in the concrete slabs. Furthermore, this paper compares the performance of the IRT as a non-contact sensor and thermocouples attached to the surface, in the evaluation of the thermal contrast on slabs with various defect depth. The dependence of maximum thermal contrast on the initial temperature and defect depth is explored using multivariate linear regression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it