MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4220959063 · doi:10.1017/9781139020299.010

Mycorrhizae and Succession

2022· book-chapter· en· W4220959063 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael F. Allen

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2022
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyEcological successionRiparian zoneEcologyBorealAgriculturePeriod (music)TaigaArchaeologyPhysical geographyHabitatAgroforestryForestryEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the nineteenth century, the Selkirk Settlement of Canada and the Homestead Act in the United States led to some of the most dramatic and widespread destruction of native ecosystems across a short time period in history. Soils across the Great Plains, from the Mississippi River to the Rocky Mountains, from the Chihuahuan desert of Mexico to the Boreal Forests of Canada, an area of around 4 million kilometers squared, were nearly all turned over for agriculture, from prairies with dense grasslands to riparian regions with extensive forest cover and deep roots, within the decades from approximately 1820 to 1890. By the 1890s, a protracted drought led to a collapse of agriculture in the United States, Canada, the Ukraine (the Selk’nam genocide), and elsewhere. The young field of ecology was just beginning, documenting the community ecology of recovery at lakeshores (182), glaciers (175), and from the abandonment of highly disturbed agricultural lands (170).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooks→Same topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions→French-language works237,207→