MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Preface

2022· article· en· W4220961106 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistory of Science and Medicine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsYesterdayArt historyHistoryLibrary scienceClassicsPhysicsComputer scienceAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 12th international symposium, The Vigier Centenary - 3rd Regime Natural Science Towards a Physics of The Observer: Honoring Noted Mathematical Physicist Jean-Pierre Vigier, 20-23 September 2021, was postponed three times due to travel restrictions imposed by the Coronavirus pandemic. The conference was originally to be held in historic Liege, Belgium, but ended up with a Virtual Meeting venue at the Noetic Advanced Studies Institute, Escalante Desert Research Facility, Beryl, Utah, USA. This symposium – the Centenary of J-P Vigier’s birth (January 16, 1920 Paris, France to May 4, 2004, Paris, France) marks the final conference in the series running for 27-years. Vigier was often called ‘Le Heretique du Physique’ in the French media. Most of his work – over 400 papers, chapters and books relates to cutting-edge extensions or alternative interpretations to ‘mainstream physics’ such as photon mass, or the de Broglie-Bohm-Vigier Causal-Stochastic Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics for example. Einstein asked Vigier to become his assistant at Princeton’s Advanced Studies Institute; but since Vigier was ‘politically involved’ with the French in Vietnam the US government would not allow him entry to the USA at that time. Thus, he became Nobelist Louis de Broglie’s assistant instead. The Vigier conference began in 1995, with the first two conferences held at York University in Toronto, Canada. It was one of a handful of such Avant-garde series ‘allowing’ physicists to color outside-the-box; including CASYS, PIRT and ANPA, which emerged in the last decades of the 20th-century to cover areas of fundamental physics which at that time had no obvious outlet for discussion. These are vital areas for discussion now, but at the time, particle physics was thought solved by string theory and supersymmetry, and gravity by various approaches to quantizing general relativity. A surprise is likely to occur with the looming experimental awakening of the imminent paradigm shift to 3rd regime Natural Science; current thinking, for all practical purposes, insists that gravity must be quantized. This arises from the belief that the quantum mechanical stochastic foam is an impenetrable basement of reality. String theory (now a 12D M-theory), an evolution of 5D Kaluza-Klein theory, has been developed as the putative theory of quantum gravity; but there is no a priori reason that gravity must be quantized. The Standard Model (SM) of particle physics and cosmology, while known to be incomplete, still myopically governs ‘allowed’ research avenues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.550
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5500.414

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicHistory of Science and MedicineFrench-language works237,207