MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220962056 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu22-3198

Instabilities and Turbulence in Two-Dimensional Magnetohydrodynamics

2022· preprint· en· W4220962056 on OpenAlexaff
Jonathan Tessier, Francis Poulin, David W. Hughes

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSolar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTachoclineMagnetohydrodynamicsPhysicsDynamoTurbulenceMagnetohydrodynamic driveMagnetohydrodynamic turbulenceRadiative transferMagnetic fieldClassical mechanicsMechanicsAstrophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The solar tachocline is a dynamically important thin region in the Sun, located between the convective and radiative zones and characterised by strong shear in both the radial and latitudinal directions. Furthermore, it is believed to play a key role in the solar dynamo process through the shearing of a poloidal field into a stronger toroidal component. Motivated by the dynamics of the tachocline we have conducted a detailed numerical exploration of the dynamics of sheared MHD turbulence. Specifically, we have implemented a parallelized numerical model using the "shenfun" Python library to solve the nonlinear two-dimensional Magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) equations to study the dynamics of unstable jets and turbulence in astrophysical plasmas. In particular, we study details of how the jet becomes unstable and the resulting cascade of energy in the case of MHD turbulence. In addition to studying the evolution of the physical quantities, we also investigate the evolution of the spectral slopes and spectral fluxes. As has been found in previous studies of MHD turbulence, a very weak large-scale magnetic field can play a key dynamical role through its amplification on small scales. For extremely weak fields, the behaviour is essentially hydrodynamic. However, once the field is dynamic, the nature of the resulting MHD solution is very different. We are able to classify the various flows and quantify the nature of the solutions in the two regimes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSolar and Space Plasma DynamicsFrench-language works237,207