North Atlantic CO2 sink variability revealed by the Go-Ship A25-OVIDE section
Bibliographic record
Abstract
About 30% of the carbon dioxide derived from human activities (CANTH) has been absorbed by the ocean (DeVries, 2014; Gruber et al., 2019; Friedlingstein et al., 2021), with the North Atlantic (NA) being one of the largest CANTH sinks per unit area (Khatiwala et al., 2013; Sabine et al., 2004). In the NA, oceanic CANTH uptake strongly relies on the meridional overturning circulation and the associated regional winter deep convection. In fact, the formation and deep spreading of Labrador Sea Water stands as a critical CANTH gateway to intermediate and abyssal depths. The NA CANTH uptake has fluctuated over the years according to changes in the North Atlantic Oscillation. Biennial observation of the marine carbonate system along the Go-Ship A25-OVIDE section has allowed us assessing the decadal and interannual variability of the CANTH storage in the subpolar NA from 2002 to 2021. In this study, we investigate 1) the trend of CANTH and 2) the relationship between the CANTH saturation, the apparent oxygen utilization, and the ventilation of the water masses between the A25-OVIDE section and the Greenland-Iceland-Scotland sills during 2002-2021. We divided the A25-OVIDE section into three main basins (Irminger, Iceland, and Eastern NA). Our results show that the Irminger Basin presents a more homogenous CANTH profile and higher CANTH saturation values at depth than the other two basins, which is related to the pronounced convective activity in the Irminger Basin. In contrast, the Eastern NA Basin has higher CANTH values at the surface due to its higher surface temperature, but its deep water masses show the lowest CANTH values since they are the less ventilated in the section. Our analysis also reveals that, overall, the NA CANTH storage has increased during 2002-2021, but varied according to the ventilation changes. While the Eastern NA water masses experienced a relatively constant, although shallower, average ventilation, the Irminger and Iceland Basins underwent a less steady CANTH uptake pattern characterized by alternating periods of strong and weak CANTH storage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".