Live birth and pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection in women with previous unilateral oophorectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ObjectiveTo quantify the effect of unilateral oophorectomy (UO) on the rates of live birth and pregnancy in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI).DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.SettingSearch of databases of published articles.Patient(s)The final analytical cohort encompassed 1,057 IVF/ICSI cycles in women with previous UO and 45,813 IVF/ICSI cycles in control women. Eighteen studies were identified by database searches of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and cited references. The review encompassed studies published up to June 1, 2021.Intervention(s)UO prior to IVF/ICSI.Main Outcome Measure(s)The primary outcomes were the rates of live birth and pregnancy following IVF/ICSI. The secondary outcomes included the amount of gonadotropins administered for ovarian stimulation and the number of retrieved oocytes.Result(s)The studies were rated from medium to high quality (from 5 to 8) according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. All studies were observational, with inherent bias, and heterogeneity was high. The primary outcome of live birth had a significantly lower odds ratio (OR) in women with previous UO compared with controls (OR = 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57 to 0.91, z = –2.72). The OR for pregnancy rate per initiated treatment cycle was also significantly lower in women with previous UO compared with controls (OR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.86, z = –3.35). Additionally, the dose of administered gonadotropins was significantly higher and the number of retrieved oocytes was significantly lower in women with UO.Conclusion(s)The meta-analysis showed a significant detrimental effect of UO on the rates of live birth and pregnancy. The analysis further supports previous data showing a decreased sensitivity to gonadotropins and a lower number of recovered oocytes in women with previous UO.Study Registration NumberPROSPERO 2020, CRD42020160313. To quantify the effect of unilateral oophorectomy (UO) on the rates of live birth and pregnancy in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI). Systematic review and meta-analysis. Search of databases of published articles. The final analytical cohort encompassed 1,057 IVF/ICSI cycles in women with previous UO and 45,813 IVF/ICSI cycles in control women. Eighteen studies were identified by database searches of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and cited references. The review encompassed studies published up to June 1, 2021. UO prior to IVF/ICSI. The primary outcomes were the rates of live birth and pregnancy following IVF/ICSI. The secondary outcomes included the amount of gonadotropins administered for ovarian stimulation and the number of retrieved oocytes. The studies were rated from medium to high quality (from 5 to 8) according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. All studies were observational, with inherent bias, and heterogeneity was high. The primary outcome of live birth had a significantly lower odds ratio (OR) in women with previous UO compared with controls (OR = 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57 to 0.91, z = –2.72). The OR for pregnancy rate per initiated treatment cycle was also significantly lower in women with previous UO compared with controls (OR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.86, z = –3.35). Additionally, the dose of administered gonadotropins was significantly higher and the number of retrieved oocytes was significantly lower in women with UO. The meta-analysis showed a significant detrimental effect of UO on the rates of live birth and pregnancy. The analysis further supports previous data showing a decreased sensitivity to gonadotropins and a lower number of recovered oocytes in women with previous UO.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".