MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220970444 · doi:10.1139/cgj-2021-0047

Unsaturated wetting deformation characteristics of a granite rockfill under rainfall conditions

2022· article· en· W4220970444 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yongkang Wu, Yin Yin, Bingyin Zhang, Xun Sun, Yuzhen Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaChina Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower ResearchNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsWettingGeotechnical engineeringDeformation (meteorology)CreepWater contentSaturation (graph theory)GeologyMaterials scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rainfall-induced unsaturated wetting deformation has been one of the main sources of postconstruction deformations of rockfill structures. An experimental study is presented of the unsaturated wetting deformation characteristics of a weakly weathered granite rockfill under different triaxial stress conditions and rainfall intensities investigated by a modified triaxial apparatus equipped with the newly developed rainfall simulator. Results show that the wetting deformation of rockfill materials occurs at a relatively small water content; when the rockfill reaches a critical wetting point (i.e., the effective water content), additional water does not produce more deformations. It is shown that the tested rockfill material has an effective water content of <6.89%, with a corresponding effective degree of saturation of <17.26%. Moreover, the unsaturated wetting deformation can be classified into two components: the instantaneous wetting deformation that occurs during rockfill wetting and exhibits properties of parallelism and the wet-state creep deformation that occurs time-dependently after the rockfill is wetted and shows features similar to those of general creep deformation, suggesting that unsaturated wetting can be considered as a generalized load. Finally, by introducing the two-stage wetting deformation model, the experimental curves of axial strain and volumetric strain against time were well predicted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicSoil and Unsaturated FlowFrench-language works237,207