MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220971802 · doi:10.1190/geo2021-0216.1

Three-dimensional magnetotelluric modeling in a mixed space-wavenumber domain

2022· article· en· W4220971802 on OpenAlexaff
Shikun Dai, Dongdong Zhao, Shunguo Wang, Kun Li, Hormoz Jahandari

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNorges ForskningsrådNatural Science Foundation of Guangxi ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsFinite element methodMathematicsMathematical analysisWavenumberFourier transformGaussian quadraturePseudo-spectral methodMagnetotelluricsApplied mathematicsIntegral equationFourier analysisPhysicsNyström method

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT We have developed a new 3D magnetotelluric modeling scheme in a mixed space-wavenumber domain. The modeling scheme is based on using a 2D Fourier transform along two horizontal directions to solve a vector-scalar potential formula derived from Maxwell’s equations based on the primary-secondary potential separation. The derived 1D governing equations in a mixed space-wavenumber domain are solved by using the finite-element method (FEM) together with a chasing method, and then the 2D inverse Fourier transform is used to recover the final solution of the electromagnetic (EM) fields in the 3D spatial domain. An iterative scheme is applied to approximate the true solution by repeating the previous steps because the governing equations cannot be solved directly due to an unusual primary-secondary potential field separation used. Nevertheless, the new method is capable of reducing the memory requirement and computational time in the mixed domain, and the 1D governing equations are highly parallel among different wavenumbers. For each of the 1D equations, the two- or four-node Gaussian quadrature rule can be used in both horizontal directions for Gauss fast Fourier transform. It is worth mentioning that the linear matrix equation to be solved is a fixed bandwidth system, and the chasing method is more efficient and convenient than solvers with preconditioners for the 1D matrix equations. The reliability and efficiency of the newly proposed method are verified with three synthetic 3D models by comparisons with a classical integral equation solution, an adaptive FEM solution, and a nonadaptive FEM solution. The proposed algorithm will be used in electrical resistivity tomography and controlled-source EM methods in future studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.428
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207