MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220972441 · doi:10.53660/conj-696-a16

Síndrome da Cimitarra em paciente com Linfoma não-Hodgkin: relato de caso

2022· article· pt· W4220972441 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueConjecturas · 2022
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies
Canadian institutionsGeomechanica (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGynecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O Linfoma não Hodgkin é uma neoplasia que se origina de mutações no tecido linfático nas células progenitoras B e T, cuja manifestação clínica se caracteriza pelo aumento de gânglios linfáticos e sintomas sistêmicos gerais. Doutro modo, a Síndrome da Cimitarra (SS) é uma variante rara de um grupo de desordens cardiovasculares congênitas, conhecido como retorno venoso pulmonar anômalo parcial, no qual o fluxo venoso pulmonar termina no átrio direito e não no átrio esquerdo. Esse relato descreve uma paciente de 60 anos, natural de Santarém-PA, que foi diagnosticada com Linfoma não Hodgkin difuso de grandes células com imunofenótipo B através de biópsia excisional e padrão imuno-histoquímico e Síndrome da Cimitarra associada, evidenciada na tomografia computadorizada de tórax. Após o diagnóstico do linfoma, conforme diretriz vigente, completou o esquema quimioterápico proposto com resposta completa e permanece em acompanhamento ambulatorial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it