Impaired functional network properties contribute to white matter hyperintensity related cognitive decline in patients with cerebral small vessel disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: White matter hyperintensity (WMH) is one of the typical neuroimaging manifestations of cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD), and the WMH correlates closely to cognitive impairment (CI). CSVD patients with WMH own altered topological properties of brain functional network, which is a possible mechanism that leads to CI. This study aims to identify differences in the characteristics of some brain functional network among patients with different grades of WMH and estimates the correlations between these different brain functional network characteristics and cognitive assessment scores. METHODS: 110 CSVD patients underwent 3.0 T Magnetic resonance imaging scans and neuropsychological cognitive assessments. WMH of each participant was graded on the basis of Fazekas grade scale and was divided into two groups: (A) WMH score of 1-2 points (n = 64), (B) WMH score of 3-6 points (n = 46). Topological indexes of brain functional network were analyzed using graph-theoretical method. T-test and Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the differences in topological properties of brain functional network between groups. Partial correlation analysis was applied to explore the relationship between different topological properties of brain functional networks and overall cognitive function. RESULTS: Patients with high WMH scores exhibited decreased clustering coefficient values, global and local network efficiency along with increased shortest path length on whole brain level as well as decreased nodal efficiency in some brain regions on nodal level (p < 0.05). Nodal efficiency in the left lingual gyrus was significantly positively correlated with patients' total Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found between two groups on the aspect of total MoCA and Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) scores (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Therefore, we come to conclusions that patients with high WMH scores showed less optimized small-world networks compared to patients with low WMH scores. Global and local network efficiency on the whole-brain level, as well as nodal efficiency in certain brain regions on the nodal level, can be viewed as markers to reflect the course of WMH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".