Mechanical Fault Prognosis through Spectral Analysis of Vibration Signals
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vibration signal analysis is the most common technique used for mechanical vibration monitoring. By using vibration sensors, the fault prognosis of rotating machinery provides a way to detect possible machine damage at an early stage and prevent property losses by taking appropriate measures. We first propose a digital integrator in frequency domain by combining fast Fourier transform with digital filtering. The velocity and displacement signals are, respectively, obtained from an acceleration signal by means of two digital integrators. We then propose a fast method for the calculation of the envelope spectra and instantaneous frequency by using the spectral properties of the signals. Cepstrum is also introduced in order to detect the unidentifiable periodic signal in the power spectrum. Further, a fault prognosis algorithm is presented by exploiting these spectral analyses. Finally, we design and implement a visualized real-time vibration analyzer on a Raspberry Pi embedded system, where our fault prognosis algorithm is the core algorithm. The real-time signals of acceleration, velocity, displacement of vibration, as well as their corresponding spectra and statistics, are visualized. The developed fault prognosis system has been successfully deployed in a water company.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it