MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220980322 · doi:10.1111/gwat.13197

Demonstration of Managed Aquifer Recharge in a Coastal Plain Aquifer: Lessons Learned

2022· article· en· W4220980322 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Meredith B. Martinez, Mark A. Widdowson, Charles Bott, Dan Holloway, Jamie Heisig‐Mitchell, Chris Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueGround Water · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicGroundwater flow and contamination studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHuman Resources and Skills Development CanadaVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
KeywordsGroundwater rechargeAquiferHydrology (agriculture)Environmental scienceGroundwaterWater qualityEffluentGeologyEnvironmental engineeringEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The sustainable water initiative for tomorrow (SWIFT) is a 378,000 m 3 /day (100 MGD) managed aquifer recharge (MAR) program designed by the Hampton Roads Sanitation District (HRSD) to rehabilitate the Potomac Aquifer System (PAS) in the Coastal Plain of Eastern Virginia. Groundwater is a primary water source in Eastern Virginia with over 93% of reported use derived from the PAS. Starting in May 2018, HRSD has operated a 3780 m 3 /day (1.0 MGD) MAR demonstration facility at the SWIFT Research Center (SWIFT‐RC) in Suffolk, Virginia. The primary aim of the SWIFT‐RC is to demonstrate, at a meaningful scale, the feasibility of MAR using deep well recharge into confined PAS hydrostratigraphic unit. The SWIFT‐RC employs advanced water treatment technology to bring secondary effluent from an HRSD wastewater treatment plant to drinking water standards. Lessons learned include the evaluation and selection of a multiple barrier carbon‐based treatment system to ensure water quality and maintain geochemical compatibility between MAR water and native groundwater, and the evaluation and selection of aluminum chlorohydrate for stabilizing aquifer clays immediately around the well to accept the fresher recharge water. The distribution of flow in the SWIFT‐RC multiscreen recharge well and associated well injectivity were variable with time resulting from changing conditions in the well. Dynamic recharge well performance was quantified through the combined analysis of intrinsic and artificial tracer transport, in situ flowmeter testing, and water level analysis. Monitoring well nests and a depth‐discrete sampling system supported a robust sampling plan to analyze chemical transport and attenuation in SWIFT‐RC groundwater.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.280
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGround WaterSame topicGroundwater flow and contamination studiesFrench-language works237,207