MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4220986632 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu22-6337

Potential of SIOS’s airborne imaging sensors in Svalbard

2022· preprint· en· W4220986632 on OpenAlexaff
Shridhar D. Jawak, Agnar Holten Sivertsen, Trond Løke, Veijo Pohjola, Małgorzata Błaszczyk, Achut Parajuli, Esther Mas Sanz, Joanna Ewa Szafraniec, Michał Laska, Julian Podgórski, Marie Bøe Henriksen, Oliver Hasler, Sagar F. Wankhede, Shunan Feng, Riccardo Cerrato, Ximena Vega, William D. Harcourt, Ilkka Matero, Øystein Godøy, Heikki Lihavainen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRemote sensingGlacierEnvironmental scienceSnowMultispectral imageArcticHyperspectral imagingFootprintMeteorologyGeographyGeologyOceanographyPhysical geography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Svalbard Integrated Arctic Earth Observing System (SIOS) is an international partnership of 26 scientific institutions from 9 countries studying the environment and climate in and around Svalbard. The key aims of SIOS are: (1) to develop an efficient observing system, (2) to share technology, experience, and data, (3) to close knowledge gaps, and (4) to decrease the environmental footprint of science. SIOS encourages the usage of airborne remote sensing platforms for research activities in Svalbard to complement in situ measurements and reduce the environmental footprint of research. SIOS member institution Norwegian Research Centre (NORCE) has installed and tested a suite of optical imaging sensors on the Lufttransport Dornier aircraft stationed in Longyearbyen as part of the SIOS-InfraNor project. Two optical sensors are installed onboard the Dornier aircraft (1) the PhaseOne IXU-180 RGB camera and (2) the HySpex VNIR-1800 hyperspectral sensor. The aircraft with these cameras is configured to acquire aerial RGB imagery and hyperspectral remote sensing data in addition to its regular transport operation in Svalbard. To date, SIOS has supported around 50 hours of flight time to acquire airborne data using Dornier aircraft in Svalbard for more than 20 scientific projects. Airborne imaging sensors include a variety of applications within glaciology, biology, hydrology, and other fields of Earth system science to understand the state of the environment of Svalbard. Mapping glacier crevasses, generating DEMs for glaciological applications, mapping and characterising earth (e.g., minerals, vegetation), ice (e.g., sea ice, icebergs, glaciers and snow cover) and ocean surface features (e.g. colour, chlorophyll) are examples of implementation. Aerial photos are also useful for monitoring the seasonal changes in snow, sea ice cover, and ocean colour. In 2021, SIOS conducted capacity building activities to train the next generation of polar scientists to use airborne imaging sensor data for their projects as part of the SIOS hyperspectral remote sensing training course (HSRS). This study presents a few selected applications from this course to demonstrate the potential of airborne imaging sensors in Svalbard. These include mapping water bodies (e.g. fjords, rivers), estimation of snow grain size, land cover classification, deriving chlorophyll, and mapping terrestrial vegetation. Preliminary results from these studies will be used to develop operational scientific applications and complement measurements from in-situ observations acquired by SIOS infrastructure in Svalbard. Eventually, these datasets will be valuable resources for calibration and validation activities for upcoming satellite hyperspectral missions, for example, the Copernicus Hyperspectral Imaging Mission for the Environment (CHIME).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score0.242

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics→French-language works237,207→