MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4220991351 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu22-4935

Abrupt climate changes caused by meltwater pulses in the Labrador Sea during the last glacial termination

2022· preprint· en· W4220991351 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Defang You, Ruediger Stein, Kirsten Fahl

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeltwaterGeologyOceanographyGlacial periodIce sheetSea iceIcebergGreenland ice sheetAntarctic sea iceClimatologyArctic ice packPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The last glacial termination is an unstable transition state characterized by abrupt climate changes, while the related physical mechanisms are still not fully understood. Here, we present well-dated high-resolution sedimentary records from the eastern Labrador Sea representing the last 23 ka. Based on our biomarker records, there was seasonal to permanent sea ice cover before 11.7 ka BP. During 11.7 to 8.2 ka BP, ice-free conditions were interrupted by several sea ice expansions, while no sea ice after 8.2 ka BP. Besides Heinrich Event 1, four prominent cold events have been identified during 14 ka to 8.2 ka BP. These abrupt events are marked by increases in sea ice, decreases in sea surface temperature, and weak deep current intensity. We propose that these events were mainly triggered by collapses of the Laurentide Ice Sheet and/or Greenland Ice Sheet, resulting in icebergs/meltwater in pulses into the Labrador Sea. This caused surface freshening, which potentially promoted the stratification of surface water, prevented the northward inflow of Atlantic Water, and limited deep water production in the Nordic Seas, consequently disrupting the climate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research→French-language works237,207→