Focusing the GWAS <i>Lens</i> on days to flower using latent variable phenotypes derived from global multi-environment trials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Adaptation constraints within crop species have resulted in limited genetic diversity in some breeding programs and/or areas where new crops have been introduced, e.g., lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) in North America. An improved understanding of the underlying genetics involved in phenology-related traits is valuable knowledge to aid breeders in overcoming limitations associated with unadapted germplasm and expanding their genetic diversity by introducing new, exotic material. We used a large, 18 site-year, multi-environment dataset, phenotyped for phenology-related traits across nine locations and over three years, along with accompanying latent variable phenotypes derived from a photothermal model and principal component analysis (PCA) of days from sowing to flower (DTF) data for a lentil diversity panel (324 accessions) which has also been genotyped with an exome capture array. Genomewide association studies (GWAS) on DTF across multiple environments helped confirm associations with known flowering time genes and identify new quantitative trait loci (QTL), which may contain previously unknown flowering time genes. Additionally, the use of latent variable phenotypes, which can incorporate environmental data such as temperature and photoperiod as both GWAS traits and as covariates, strengthened associations, revealed additional hidden associations, and alluded to potential roles of the associated QTL. Our approach can be replicated with other crop species, and the results from our GWAS serve as a resource for further exploration into the complex nature of phenology-related traits across the major growing environments for cultivated lentil.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".