MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220993612 · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2022.100529

Lessons learned from two feasibility trials of a translated and minimally monitored iCBT program for young adults among community and university samples

2022· article· en· W4220993612 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternet Interventions · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMental Health Treatment and Access
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAttritionAnxietyGeneralized anxiety disorderMental healthMedicinePatient Health QuestionnairePsychological resilienceClinical psychologyDepression (economics)PopulationClinical trialExposure therapyPsychiatryPsychologyDepressive symptomsEnvironmental healthPsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Young adults are less likely to use traditional mental health services than adults. iCBT may be more youth friendly, but its access remains limited in several countries. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of a minimally monitored transdiagnostic iCBT program translated from English to French and offered in Canada for the treatment of anxiety and depression among young adults. The impact of the program on resilience was also assessed. Twenty-five participants from community and university samples were included in the analyses in two separate single-group feasibility trials with a 3-month follow-up. Feasibility outcomes were attrition, adherence, treatment acceptability and treatment gains. Outcome measures included the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) and Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). In Trial 1 (N = 10), recruiting among the general population proved to be challenging. Low adherence (20%) and high attrition (80%) rates were observed. Methodological changes to recruitment were made and a second trial was conducted among university students using incentives (N = 15). About half of the participants completed treatment (55%, n = 8/15), 12/15 provided post-treatment data and 8/15 provided 3-month follow-up data. All study completers (100%; n = 14) reported they would recommend the program. Mixed effects model analyses revealed significant and large pre-post treatment reductions on the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 (Cohen's d = 1.09 and 1.64 respectively) with treatment gains maintained at follow-up. Moderate improvements were found on the CD-RISC post-treatment with further gains at follow-up (ds = 0.55 and 1.10 respectively). These finding suggest that future research on this French-Canadian version of the Mood Mechanic Course is feasible with appropriate attention to recruitment. Translating existing iCBT interventions and using minimal monitoring may be an optimal first step to initiate the cross-cultural dissemination of iCBT while increasing access to treatments among young adults. Lessons learned are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.357
Threshold uncertainty score0.967

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.328
GPT teacher head0.485
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it