MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220994251 · doi:10.1016/j.eucr.2022.102068

Retroperitoneal hematoma post percutaneous sacral nerve evaluation: A case report

2022· article· en· W4220994251 on OpenAlexaff
N Aldossary, Magdy Hassouna

Bibliographic record

VenueUrology Case Reports · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPelvic and Acetabular Injuries
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSurgeryHematomaPercutaneous

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sacral neuromodulation is an accepted therapy for various voiding dysfunction. We report a 71-year-old male with a history of BPH post TURP and overactive bladder. He was on anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation. He underwent uneventful percutaneous sacral nerve evaluation. Five days later, he showed no improvement. Temporary lead was removed in clinic without complications. On day ten, he developed lower abdominal, and genital skin bruising. CT scan showed presacral retroperitoneal hematoma. His Hemoglobin dropped. He was admitted, managed conservatively and discharged with a stable hemoglobin. Retroperitoneal hematoma post PNE is rare. Management is conservative. Angioembolization is reserved for unstable patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUrology Case ReportsSame topicPelvic and Acetabular InjuriesFrench-language works237,207