MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220997490 · doi:10.3390/electronics11060862

Machine Learning-Based Satellite Routing for SAGIN IoT Networks

2022· article· en· W4220997490 on OpenAlexaff
Xueguang Yuan, Jinlin Liu, Hang Du, Yangan Zhang, Feisheng Li, Michel Kadoch

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceExtreme learning machineCommunications satelliteRouting (electronic design automation)Transmission (telecommunications)SatelliteReal-time computingComputer networkDistributed computingArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsArtificial neural networkEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to limited coverage, radio access provided by ground communication systems is not available everywhere on the Earth. It is necessary to develop a new three-dimensional network architecture in a bid to meet various connection requirements. Space–air–ground integrated networks (SAGINs) offer large coverage, but the communication quality of satellites is often compromised by weather conditions. To solve this problem, we propose an extended extreme learning machine (ELM) algorithm in this paper, which can predict the communication attenuation caused by rainy weather to satellite communication links, so as to avoid large path loss caused by bad weather conditions. Firstly, we use Internet of Things (IoT)-enabled sensors to collect weather-related data. Then, the system feeds the data to the extended ELM model to obtain a category prediction for blockage caused by weather. Finally, this information helps the selection of the data transmission link and thus improves the satellite routing performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.767

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronicsSame topicSatellite Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207