MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220997579 · doi:10.1029/2021gl097154

Extratropical Shortwave Cloud Feedbacks in the Context of the Global Circulation and Hydrological Cycle

2022· article· en· W4220997579 on OpenAlexafffund
Daniel T. McCoy, Paul R. Field, Michelle Frazer, Mark D. Zelinka, Gregory S. Elsaesser, Johannes Mülmenstädt, Ivy Tan, Timothy A. Myers, Zachary J. Lebo

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric aerosols and clouds
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersPacific Northwest National LaboratoryLawrence Livermore National LaboratoryUniversity of WyomingBiological and Environmental ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationNuclear Safety and Security CommissionBattelleOffice of ScienceNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationU.S. Department of EnergyDivision of Earth SciencesNational Science Foundation
KeywordsExtratropical cycloneClimatologyContext (archaeology)ShortwaveGeneral Circulation ModelEnvironmental scienceWater cycleCloud computingMeteorologyCirculation (fluid dynamics)GeologyClimate changeGeographyOceanographyComputer scienceRadiative transferPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Shortwave (SW) cloud feedback (SW FB ) is the primary driver of uncertainty in the effective climate sensitivity (ECS) predicted by global climate models (GCMs). ECS for several GCMs participating in the sixth assessment report exceed 5K, above the fifth assessment report “likely” maximum (4.5K) due to extratropical SW FB 's that are more positive than those simulated in the previous generation of GCMs. Here we show that across 57 GCMs Southern Ocean SW FB can be predicted from the sensitivity of column‐integrated liquid water mass (LWP) to moisture convergence and to surface temperature. The response of LWP to moisture convergence and the response of albedo to LWP anti‐correlate across GCMs. This is because GCMs that simulate a larger response of LWP to moisture convergence tend to have higher mean‐state LWPs, which reduces the impact of additional LWP on albedo. Observational constraints suggest a modestly negative Southern Ocean SW FB — inconsistent with extreme ECS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.348

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicAtmospheric aerosols and cloudsFrench-language works237,207