MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220997640 · doi:10.18280/ijdne.170110

Linear Regression Analysis Using Log Transformation Model for Rainfall Data in Water Resources Management Krueng Pase, Aceh, Indonesia

2022· article· en· W4220997640 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ichwana Ramli, Hairul Basri, Ashfa Achmad, Rahajeng G.A.P. Basuki, Moch. Abdilah Nafis

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrological Forecasting Using AI
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversitas Syiah Kuala
KeywordsWind speedLinear regressionRegression analysisWatershedWater resourcesEnvironmental scienceAgricultureStatisticsRegressionMathematicsGeographyMeteorologyClimatologyHydrology (agriculture)Computer scienceEcologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Climate changes are one crucial factor that influenced water availability at one location since they affected the environmental, social, and agricultural systems.The study observed the agent factors that influenced the rainfall changes at Krueng Pasee Aceh watershed, Indonesia.The method used in this research is a linear regression with a log transformation approach on predictor variables.The data used in this study consisted of rainfall, a total of rainy days, temperature, humidity, duration of irradiation, and wind speed in the period ranging from 1992 to 2020.Results showed that the agent factors had not distributed normally.The regression model produced after log transformation had met the classical assumptions and can be used to predict the rainfall at R-quare 24.61% with an RMSE value of 57.676.From all factors studied, the wind speed should be excluded.Further study is recommended to use the nonlinear method to improve the model for rainfall prediction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and EcodynamicsSame topicHydrological Forecasting Using AIFrench-language works237,207