MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220998414 · doi:10.18280/ijsse.120115

Maturity Models for Business Continuity–A Systematic Literature Review

2022· article· en· W4220998414 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Diogo Pinto, André Fernandes, Miguel Mira da Silva, Rúben Pereira

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Safety and Security Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSupply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaturity (psychological)Systematic reviewBusiness process managementWork (physics)Process (computing)Process managementCapability Maturity ModelBusiness continuityBusiness processEvent (particle physics)Computer scienceBusiness process modelingRisk analysis (engineering)BusinessEngineeringWork in processOperations managementPolitical scienceComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Business continuity refers to the planning and preparation done ahead of time to ensure that an organization's essential business processes can continue to work in the event of an emergency. Natural disasters, business crises, pandemics, workplace crime, or any other incident that disrupts business operations are examples of emergencies. Maturity models provide companies with a way to assess their relative implementation for a management framework. This paper provides a Process Assessment Model for Business Continuity based on a Systematic Literature Review. The selected articles from the literature provide information about the state-of-the-art in this research field, an understanding of the numerous research activities that have been undertaken in recent years, and a forecast of potential developments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.917
Threshold uncertainty score0.427

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Safety and Security EngineeringSame topicSupply Chain Resilience and Risk ManagementFrench-language works237,207