MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4221003691 · doi:10.1016/j.ccl.2022.03.007

A Review of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients with COVID-19

2022· review· en· W4221003691 on OpenAlexafffund
Nima Ghasemzadeh, Nathan Kim, Shy Amlani, Mina Madan, Jay Shavadia, Aun‐Yeong Chong, Alireza Bagherli, Akshay Bagai, Jacqueline Saw, Jyotpal Singh, Payam Dehghani

Bibliographic record

VenueCardiology Clinics · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science CentreSt. Michael's HospitalHealth Sciences CentreWindsor Regional HospitalUniversity of OttawaGenome PrairieUniversity of TorontoRoyal University HospitalVancouver General HospitalSaskatchewan HealthUniversity of SaskatchewanWilliam Osler Health System
FundersSaskatchewan Health Research Foundation
KeywordsMedicineMyocardial infarctionCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Internal medicineCardiologyPandemicMyocarditisCardiomyopathyDiseaseSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Intensive care medicineHeart failureInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0070.008
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.172
GPT teacher head0.480
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCardiology ClinicsSame topicCOVID-19 and healthcare impactsFrench-language works237,207