SomaticSiMu: a mutational signature simulator
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY: SomaticSiMu is an in silico simulator of single and double base substitutions, and single base insertions and deletions in an input genomic sequence to mimic mutational signatures. SomaticSiMu outputs simulated DNA sequences and mutational catalogues with imposed mutational signatures. The tool is the first mutational signature simulator featuring a graphical user interface, control of mutation rates and built-in visualization tools of the simulated mutations. Simulated datasets are useful as a ground truth to test the accuracy and sensitivity of DNA sequence classification tools and mutational signature extraction tools under different experimental scenarios. The reliability of SomaticSiMu was affirmed by (i) supervised machine learning classification of simulated sequences with different mutation types and burdens, and (ii) mutational signature extraction from simulated mutational catalogues. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: SomaticSiMu is written in Python 3.8.3. The open-source code, documentation and tutorials are available at https://github.com/HillLab/SomaticSiMu under the terms of the CreativeCommonsAttribution4.0InternationalLicense. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".