MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4221017709 · doi:10.1088/2399-6528/ac623c

Mathematical and numerical modelling of copper transport in yeast

2022· article· en· W4221017709 on OpenAlexaff
Aaron Francis Wilkins, Maria Laura Sosa Ponce, Vanina Zaremberg, Michael E. Wieser, Brandon Karchewski

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Communications · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicTrace Elements in Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeYeastMass transportBiological systemTransport systemSystems biologyBiochemical engineeringTransport phenomenaMathematical modelChemistryComputer scienceComputational biologyBiologyPhysicsBiochemistryEngineeringMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The transport and regulation of metals in eukaryotic cells is a complex process, dependent on protein transporters that respond to cell needs. The application of dynamic mathematical models can provide valuable insights into these transport mechanisms. Mathematical simulations of transport processes may not directly predict transport mechanisms but can guide experimental design or identify inconsistencies between observation and hypotheses. Copper is an essential metal in eukaryotic cells as a catalytic co-factor in metallochaperone proteins and is therefore tightly regulated in living systems, making it valuable for quantifying biological transport mechanisms. In order to test our modeling system, a culture of baker’s yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) was grown, copper concentrations were obtained from the cells and growth media, and a mathematical model was developed to investigate transport mechanisms between the growth media and the cells. A model based on conservation of mass was presented as a system of equations upon which to develop. This system of equations was developed to include an active transport term that describes a homeostatic concentration that cells actively maintain through negative feedback, and with a delayed activation, the model was more accurate at predicting the experimental data. The hypothesis and dynamic model derived in this work provide a novel framework that may be applied to additional metals or used to describe other transport mechanisms in biological systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics CommunicationsSame topicTrace Elements in HealthFrench-language works237,207