MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4221018797 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu22-4862

High-resolution inclination records from Sites U1418 and U1419 in the Gulf of Alaska (IODP Expedition 341)

2022· preprint· en· W4221018797 on OpenAlexaff
Julie Heggdal Velle, Maureen H. Walczak, Brendan T. Reilly, Guillaume St‐Onge, Joseph S. Stoner, Stewart Fallon, Alan C Mix, Christina L. Belanger, Matthias Forwick

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySedimentary depositional environmentPaleomagnetismRemanenceRadiocarbon datingSedimentary rockCoringLithologySedimentPaleontologyChronologyDrillingMagnetization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

International Ocean Drilling Program (IODP) Expedition 341 in the Gulf of Alaska recovered a 112-meter-long sedimentary record from the continental slope at Site U1419. At this site, an exceptionally expanded late Pleistocene sequence (sedimentation rates >100 cm/kyr) combined with a high-resolution radiocarbon chronology (Walczak et al., 2020), provide an opportunity to study Paleomagnetic Secular Variations (PSV) on centennial to millennial timescales over the past ~43,000 years. Natural and laboratory-induced magnetic remanence were measured on u-channels using the stepwise AF demagnetization procedure. In addition to continuous magnetic susceptibility measurements, hysteresis parameters were obtained on 95 discrete samples, and IRM acquisition curves on 9 discrete samples to obtain additional information on the magnetic mineralogy of the sediment. Due to the influence of lithology, magnetic mineralogy, depositional and post-depositional processes, Site U1419 is not suitable for paleointensity studies. However, with removal of intervals influenced by the environmental signal and/or coring deformation, the high sedimentation rates at this site have helped to preserve a reliable record of inclination. Because of signal to noise issues, inclination as measured after the 20 mT AF demagnetization step provides the most accurate estimate. This is demonstrated by comparing the U1419 inclination to a stack of the shipboard inclination at Site U1418 on a new age model developed from 19 radiocarbon dates on U1418 and 18 magnetic susceptibility-based tie-points to site survey core EW0408-87JC (Praetorius et al., 2015). This independently replicated inclination record verifies centennial to millennial scale variations in the Gulf of Alaska that can now be compared with other northeast Pacific and western North American records to begin deciphering geomagnetic variability and provide a new stratigraphic correlation tool for 15 and 30 cal kyr BP interval in this region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.091

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism StudiesFrench-language works237,207