MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4221024173 · doi:10.5194/essd-2021-281-rc2

Comment on essd-2021-281

2022· peer-review· en· W4221024173 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepeer-review
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVegetation (pathology)GeographyTaigaPhysical geographyBorealDigital elevation modelForest inventoryForestryTundraCartographyRemote sensingEcologyArchaeologyEcosystemForest management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This data collection is an attempt to remedy the scarcity of tree level forest structure data in the circum-boreal region, whilst providing, as part of the data collection, adjusted and labelled tree level and vegetation plot level data for machine learning and upscaling practices. Publicly available comprehensive datasets on tree level forest structure are rare, due to the involvement of governmental agencies, public sectors, and private actors that all influence the availability of these datasets. We present datasets of vegetation composition and tree and plot level forest structure for two important vegetation transition zones in Siberia, Russia; the summergreen–evergreen transition zone in central Yakutia and the tundra–taiga transition zone in Chukotka (NE Siberia). The SiDroForest collection contains a variety of data mainly based on unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and field data collected from 64 vegetation plots during fieldwork jointly performed by the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research (AWI) and the North-Eastern Federal University of Yakutsk (NEFU) during the Chukotka 2018 expedition to Siberia. The data collection consists of four separate datasets. The fieldwork locations are the anchors that bind the data types together based on the location of the vegetation plot. i) The first dataset (Kruse et al., 2021, https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.933263) provides UAV-borne data products covering the 64 vegetation plots surveyed during fieldwork: including structure from motion (SfM) point clouds, point-cloud products such as Digital Elevation Model (DEM), Canopy Height Model (CHM), Digital Surface Model (DSM) and Digital Terrain Model (DTM) constructed from Red Green Blue (RGB) and Red Green Near Infrared (RGN) orthomosaics. Forest structure and vegetation composition data are crucial in the assessment of whether a forest is to act as a carbon sink under changing climate conditions. Fieldwork and UAV-products can provide such data in depth. ii) The second dataset contains spatial data in the form of points and polygon shape files of 872 labelled individual trees and shrubs that were recorded during fieldwork at the same vegetation plots with information on tree height, crown diameter, and species (van Geffen et al., 2021c, https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.932821). These tree- and shrub-individual labelled point and polygon shape files were generated and are located on the UAV RGB orthoimages. The individual number links to the information collected during the expedition such as tree height, crown diameter and vitality provided in table format. This dataset can be used to link individual trees in the SfM point clouds, providing unique insights into the vegetation composition and also allows future monitoring of the individual trees and the contents of the recorded vegetation plots at large. iii) The third dataset contains a synthesis of 10 000 generated images and masks that have the tree crowns of two species of larch (Larix gmelinii and Larix cajanderi) automatically extracted from the RGB UAV images in the common objects in context (COCO) format (van Geffen et al., 2021a, https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.932795). The synthetic dataset was created specifically to detect Siberian larch species. iv) If publicly available forest-structure datasets at tree level are rarely available for Siberia, even fewer ready-to-use tree and plot level data are available for machine learning approaches, for example optimised data formats containing annotated vegetation categories. The fourth set contains Sentinel-2 Level-2 bottom of atmosphere labelled image patches with seasonal information and annotated vegetation categories covering the vegetation plots (van Geffen et al., 2021b, https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.933268). The dataset is created with the aim of providing a small ready-to use validation and training data set to be used in various vegetation-related machine-learning tasks. The SidroForest data collection serves a variety of user communities. First of all, the UAV-derived top of canopy structure information, orthomosaics and the detailed vegetation information in the labelled data set provide detailed information on forest type, structure and composition for scientific communities with ecological and biological applications. The detailed Land Cover and Vegetation structure information in the first two data sets are of use for the generation and validation of Land Cover remote sensing products in radar and optical remote sensing. In addition to providing information on forest structure and vegetation composition of the vegetation plots, parts of the SiDroForest dataset are prepared to be used as training and validation data for machine learning purposes. For example, the Synthetic tree crown dataset is generated from the raw UAV images and optimized to be used in neural networks. Furthermore, the fourth SiDroForest data set contains standardized Sentinel-2 labelled image patches that provide training data on vegetation class categories for machine learning classification with JSON labels provided. The SiDroForst data collective serves as a basis to add future data collected during expeditions performed by the Alfred Wegener Institute, creating a larger dataset in the upcoming years that can provide unique insights into remote hard to reach boreal regions of Siberia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.042
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.261

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.042
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0340.018
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0780.089

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications→French-language works237,207→