MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4221030285 · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2022.110540

A systematic review and meta-analysis of structural and functional brain alterations in individuals with genetic and clinical high-risk for psychosis and bipolar disorder

2022· review· en· W4221030285 on OpenAlexaff
Licia Luna, Joaquim Raduà, Lydia Fortea, Gisela Sugranyes, Adriana Fortea, Paolo Fusar‐Poli, Lee Smith, Joseph Firth, Jae Il Shin, André R. Brunoni, Muhammad Ishrat Husain, Muhammad O. Husian, Haris I. Sair, Walber O. Mendes, Luiz Ricardo Araújo Uchôa, Michael Berk, Michaël Maes, Zafiris J. Daskalakis, Sophia Frangou, Michele Fornaro, Eduard Vieta, Brendon Stubbs, Marco Solmi, André F. Carvalho

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBipolar Disorder and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaOttawa HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBipolar disorderPrecuneusNeuroimagingPsychosisNeurosciencePsychologySchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)VoxelSuperior frontal gyrusPsychiatryFunctional magnetic resonance imagingMedicineCognitionRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.360
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueProgress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological PsychiatrySame topicBipolar Disorder and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207