Estimation of grain quality parameters in rice for high‐throughput screening with near‐infrared spectroscopy and deep learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background and Objectives Grain quality is a complex trait in rice, compared with other staple crops as it is predominantly consumed as a whole grain. Although considered secondary to yield, to align with consumer preferences, breeders are increasingly interested in quality. At the early stages of a breeding program, grain quality‐related traits are often ignored as they are arduous and time‐consuming. Near‐infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) could be a suitable high‐throughput alternative to conventional wet chemistry and image processing‐related methods to be adopted for early screening. This study aims to quantify traits essential for rice breeders such as amylose, chalkiness, length, width, and the length/width ratio in rice samples with NIRS. We used conventional algorithms such as principal component analysis (PCA), partial least square regression (PLSR), multilayer perceptron (MLP), support vector classification (SVC), and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) to compare with the proposed convolutional neural network (CNN) for regression and classification. Findings Our results showed that the proposed CNN outperformed the conventional models in estimating all traits. Unlike conventional models, CNN models could be developed with raw spectra with minimal to no preprocessing, and along with the transfer‐learning capabilities, the time required for model development could be significantly reduced. Conclusion We recommend NIRS for quantitative estimation of amylose and chalkiness in rice and rather use classification/categorized estimation for other physical dimension‐related traits such as length and length/width ratio. Significance and Novelty We found NIRS to be an appropriate alternative to wet chemistry and image‐based methods for screening lines at the early stages of the breeding program. Estimation of physical parameters such as length and length/width ratio with NIRS is novel and appears reasonable for high‐throughput applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".