MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4221032200 · doi:10.1111/1365-2478.13196

In search of the vibroseis first arrival

2022· article· en· W4221032200 on OpenAlexaff
Stewart Trickett

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Prospecting · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsBayer (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeismic vibratorGeologyWaveletArrival timeSeismologyEnergy (signal processing)WaveformNoise (video)GeodesyComputer scienceStatisticsTelecommunicationsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The first step in correcting for time delays of land seismic data due to low‐velocity weathered layers is to pick the first‐arrival times of the refracting energy. But doing so for vibroseis data can be difficult, as the seismic wavelet is often ringy and uncompact, resulting in cycle‐skipped picks. Even when we manage to pick a waveform feature consistently, it is not clear where the first‐arrival time is in relation to it. I present a novel method that shapes the seismic wavelet to a Ricker wavelet whose peak is located at the true arrival time, so the time of the first arrival is unambiguous. Further, the arrivals are less ringy and their energy more focused, so that they are less likely to cycle skip or be overwhelmed by random noise. The result is more accurate and consistent first‐arrival picks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical ProspectingSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207