MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4221035301 · doi:10.1029/2021gl097526

Standing Alfvén Waves Within Equatorial Plasma Bubbles

2022· article· en· W4221035301 on OpenAlexaff
Hossein Ghadjari, D. J. Knudsen, S. Skone

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsIonosphereGeophysicsPlasmaMagnetic fieldElectric fieldField lineComputational physicsMagnetometerStanding waveSpacecraftOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Plasma depletions in the disturbed equatorial ionosphere are known to be associated with magnetic fluctuations and Alfvén waves. Here, using data from the Swarm B satellite's vector field magnetometer and electric fields instrument at an altitude of ∼500 km, we present evidence of standing Alfvén modes trapped within strong density depletions. Fourier transforms of electric (δE) and magnetic (δB) perturbations reveal harmonic structure with anticorrelated peaks and relative phase shifts approaching ±90°, in agreement with a simple model of standing waves sampled from a moving spacecraft. The mode frequencies allow us to estimate the field‐aligned length of the bubbles, which we find to be in the range of 110–200 km. This value is much smaller than the overall field line length mapped to the two E‐region footprints, indicating that the waves we observe do not couple to the lower ionosphere.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research Letters→Same topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics→French-language works237,207→