Retrieval of Lake Ice Characteristics from SAR Imagery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Boreal lakes ecosystems can remain partially or completely covered by ice and snow during an important portion of the year. Alterations of lake and river ice properties can deteriorate the conditions of local ice roads, negatively influencing Nordic communities and economical activities. Monitoring of lake ice characteristics and dynamics is therefore crucial. In this study, Sentinel-1 Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) satellite imagery is exploited to evaluate changes in the ice regime over shallow and deep high-latitude lakes during the winters of 2018 and 2019. The methodology proposed, based on the combined analysis of SAR intensity and interferometric coherence maps, enables the extraction of important characteristics of ice dynamics. Overall, the lake ice thickness change derived from Differential Interferometric SAR (D-InSAR) increases with the lake depth. The D-InSAR-derived mean rate of growth, in general, agrees with the one estimated from records of in-situ ice thickness measurements. The methodology presented herein could be temporally extended to support the understanding of historical and current climate conditions. This could be done by using archived and newly available imagery to improve lake ice models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".