MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4221037544 · doi:10.4000/rfsic.12840

Anquetil Sophie, Duteil Carine et Lloveria Vivien (2019), Le Sens des données. Le statut du corpus et herméneutique à l’aune des humanités numériques. Paris, L'Harmattan.

2022· article· fr· W4221037544 on OpenAlexaff
Kaouther Azouz

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue française des sciences de l’information et de la communication · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le sens des données, est un ouvrage collectif, dirigé par Sophie AQUETIL, Carine DTEUIL – MOUGEL et Vivien LLOVERIA. Cet ouvrage s’inscrit dans la lignée des travaux de la philosophie de technique, l’épistémologie des données et le sens qu’elles peuvent avoir dans un contexte numérique. Les co-auteurs interrogent, dans leur analyse, le signe sémiotique, le contenu sémantique et les usages de la pragmatique pour détecter la manière selon laquelle se construit le sens de la donnée numérique et...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score0.162

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.007
Scholarly communication0.0090.008
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue française des sciences de l’information et de la communicationSame topicLinguistics and Discourse AnalysisFrench-language works237,207