MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4221037899 · doi:10.26493/2590-9770.1494.1e4

Some Erdös-Ko-Rado results for linear and affine groups of degree two

2022· article· en· W4221037899 on OpenAlexafffund
Karen Meagher, Andriaherimanana Sarobidy Razafimahatratra

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Art of Discrete and Applied Mathematics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topicgraph theory and CDMA systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCombinatoricsMathematicsAdjacency matrixAffine transformationDegree (music)Group (periodic table)Algebraic numberGraphGeneral linear groupDegree matrixProperty (philosophy)Discrete mathematicsPure mathematicsSymmetric groupMathematical analysisPhysicsLine graphGraph power

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we show that both the general linear group GL(2,q) and the special linear group SL(2,q) have both the EKR property and the EKR-module property. This is done using an algebraic method; a weighted adjacency matrix for the derangement graph for the group is found and Hoffman’s ratio bound is applied to this matrix. We also consider the group AGL(2,q) and the 2-intersecting sets in PGL(2,q).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.161
Threshold uncertainty score0.327

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Art of Discrete and Applied MathematicsSame topicgraph theory and CDMA systemsFrench-language works237,207