MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4221039197 · doi:10.1002/mp.15597

Role of water in the crystal structure of LiPCDA monomer and the radiotherapy dose response of EBT‐3 film

2022· article· en· W4221039197 on OpenAlexafffund
Rohith Kaiyum, Christopher W. Schruder, Ozzy Mermut, Alexandra Rink

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoToronto Rehabilitation InstituteYork UniversityUniversity Health Network
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsDosimeterMaterials scienceDosimetryAbsorbanceIrradiationImaging phantomCrystal (programming language)Absorbed doseOpticsRadiationAnalytical Chemistry (journal)LinearityNuclear medicineChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Radiochromic material used in recent commercial films has been suggested as a candidate for in vivo dosimetry because of its dose sensitivity, real-time response, and atomic composition. It was observed that its sensitive material, lithium pentacosa-10,12-diynoate (LiPCDA), can have two distinct forms, with main absorbance peaks at ∼635 and ∼674 nm. The spectrum of the latter is similar to that of pentacosa-10,12-diynoic acid (PCDA) used in the commercial predecessor, obtained through desiccation of the commercial film. Water was suggested to be a part of the crystal structure and thus its presence or absence would affect dosimetric parameters. The objective of this study is to: (a) investigate how desiccated commercial films compared to the native form in terms of macroscopic crystal structure, dose-response, signal linearity, and post-exposure kinetics; (b) demonstrate proof-of-concept that the two versions can be combined into one optical dosimeter and measured simultaneously. METHODS: Commercial radiochromic film, EBT-3, was desiccated for 10 days at 45°C. Using a 6 MV LINAC beam and standard setup of 100 Source to Axis Distance (SAD), 10 cm × 10 cm field size, and 1.5 cm depth, commercial and desiccated films were irradiated to 50, 100, 200, 500, 1000, 2000, 3000 cGy and the latter to 4000, 5000, and 7000 cGy. A custom phantom equipped with optical fibers for real-time read-out was used for all measurements. Absorbance spectra were collected at ∼1 Hz before, during, and after irradiation. Data were collected for ∼1 h after the end of irradiation for 200 cGy experiments. The radiation-induced change in optical density (∆OD) was calculated with a 10 nm band around the primary absorbance peak. The post-exposure percent optical density change was calculated and compared to ∆OD at the end of irradiation. Both commercial and desiccated films were also irradiated and measured simultaneously as proof-of-concept for using two materials within one optical path. For electron microscopy imaging, active materials from commercial and desiccated films were imaged on a scanning electron microscope at an accelerating voltage of 10 kV. RESULTS: Scanning electron microscope images showed that desiccated film was similar in topographical structure to the commercial EBT-3 form. It maintained a non-linear ∆OD with dose but resulted in ∼1/3 signal compared to the commercial film. Evaluation of post-exposure response showed significantly lower percent increase in ∆OD for desiccated film initially, with no statistically significant difference at 1 h after the end of irradiation. Combining both films and simultaneously measuring their absorbance illustrated that the two absorbance peaks were identifiable and resolvable to allow for an independent determination of dose from each. CONCLUSIONS: Water is implicated in the crystal structure of the EBT-3 radiochromic film, with its removal through desiccation affecting both dosimetric and spectroscopic characteristics of the material. The two forms of radiochromic material (with and without water) are spectrally resolvable allowing for independent dose determination from each, opening up possibilities for dose measurements at different locations along a single fiber.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Radiotherapy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207