Role of water in the crystal structure of LiPCDA monomer and the radiotherapy dose response of EBT‐3 film
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Radiochromic material used in recent commercial films has been suggested as a candidate for in vivo dosimetry because of its dose sensitivity, real-time response, and atomic composition. It was observed that its sensitive material, lithium pentacosa-10,12-diynoate (LiPCDA), can have two distinct forms, with main absorbance peaks at ∼635 and ∼674 nm. The spectrum of the latter is similar to that of pentacosa-10,12-diynoic acid (PCDA) used in the commercial predecessor, obtained through desiccation of the commercial film. Water was suggested to be a part of the crystal structure and thus its presence or absence would affect dosimetric parameters. The objective of this study is to: (a) investigate how desiccated commercial films compared to the native form in terms of macroscopic crystal structure, dose-response, signal linearity, and post-exposure kinetics; (b) demonstrate proof-of-concept that the two versions can be combined into one optical dosimeter and measured simultaneously. METHODS: Commercial radiochromic film, EBT-3, was desiccated for 10 days at 45°C. Using a 6 MV LINAC beam and standard setup of 100 Source to Axis Distance (SAD), 10 cm × 10 cm field size, and 1.5 cm depth, commercial and desiccated films were irradiated to 50, 100, 200, 500, 1000, 2000, 3000 cGy and the latter to 4000, 5000, and 7000 cGy. A custom phantom equipped with optical fibers for real-time read-out was used for all measurements. Absorbance spectra were collected at ∼1 Hz before, during, and after irradiation. Data were collected for ∼1 h after the end of irradiation for 200 cGy experiments. The radiation-induced change in optical density (∆OD) was calculated with a 10 nm band around the primary absorbance peak. The post-exposure percent optical density change was calculated and compared to ∆OD at the end of irradiation. Both commercial and desiccated films were also irradiated and measured simultaneously as proof-of-concept for using two materials within one optical path. For electron microscopy imaging, active materials from commercial and desiccated films were imaged on a scanning electron microscope at an accelerating voltage of 10 kV. RESULTS: Scanning electron microscope images showed that desiccated film was similar in topographical structure to the commercial EBT-3 form. It maintained a non-linear ∆OD with dose but resulted in ∼1/3 signal compared to the commercial film. Evaluation of post-exposure response showed significantly lower percent increase in ∆OD for desiccated film initially, with no statistically significant difference at 1 h after the end of irradiation. Combining both films and simultaneously measuring their absorbance illustrated that the two absorbance peaks were identifiable and resolvable to allow for an independent determination of dose from each. CONCLUSIONS: Water is implicated in the crystal structure of the EBT-3 radiochromic film, with its removal through desiccation affecting both dosimetric and spectroscopic characteristics of the material. The two forms of radiochromic material (with and without water) are spectrally resolvable allowing for independent dose determination from each, opening up possibilities for dose measurements at different locations along a single fiber.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".