MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4221039693 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu22-7341

Time evolution of the magmatic intrusion below La Palma before eruption

2022· preprint· en· W4221039693 on OpenAlexaff
José Fernández, Joaquín Escayo, Antonio G. Camacho, Mimmo Palano, Juan F. Prieto, Zhongbo Hu, Sergey Samsonov, K. F. Tiampo, Eumenio Ancochea Soto

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Tectonic Studies in Latin America
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySeismologyUnrestInterferometric synthetic aperture radarVolcanoIntrusionGeodesyHypocenterInversion (geology)Slip (aerodynamics)TectonicsSynthetic aperture radarRemote sensingInduced seismicityGeochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>La Palma, Canary Islands, had volcanic unrest, which culminated in an eruption that started on 19 September 2021 and ended on 13 December 2021. We study the last years of this unrest using satellite radar interferometry (InSAR) and apply a novel inversion methodology to obtain information about magmatic plumbing system (MPS) configuration and its temporal evolution. The result provides the deformation sources as 3D cell aggregations for which the inversion adjustment process automatically assigns a source type (pressure change, strike-slip, dip-slip or tensile dislocation), magnitude values (MPa and cm respectively), position and orientation (angles of dislocation planes). We also update the model of the crustal structure using a novel approach. We describe the obtained results for the MPS, their relation with the crustal structure, novelties and limitations, as well as their implications at the local level, for the Canary Islands and other active areas.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.453
Threshold uncertainty score0.902

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0990.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Tectonic Studies in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207