Novel Methacrylamide Polymers Based on Thiazole and Styrene: A Study on Synthesis, Characterization, and Determination of Monomer Reactivity Ratios
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, firstly, a thiazole methacrylamide (TMAAm) monomer was synthesized from methacryloyl chloride with 2-aminothiazole. Later on, a series of copolymers of 2-thiazole methacrylamide (TMAAm) with styrene (St) using strange compositions in the feed has been prepared in solution via radical at 70 oC with AIBN as initiator. The structure of the copolymers was elucidated by FT-IR, 1H-NMR, and 13C-NMR spectroscopy methods. The compositions of the copolymers were determined from the nitrogen (N) difference according to the elemental analysis results. Monomer reactivity ratios; The rTMAAm and rSt, Fineman-Ross (FR), Kelen-Tüdös (KT) linear methods, and the error method model in non-linear variables were calculated with the computer program RREVM. The molecular weights and heterogeneity indices of the copolymers were determined by the GPC method. The thermal stability of the copolymers was investigated by thermogravimetry (TG) measurements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it