Brain-spinal cord interaction in long-term motor sequence learning in human: An fMRI study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The spinal cord is important for sensory guidance and execution of skilled movements. Yet its role in human motor learning is not well understood. Despite evidence revealing an active involvement of spinal circuits in the early phase of motor learning, whether long-term learning engages similar changes in spinal cord activation and functional connectivity remains unknown. Here, we investigated spinal-cerebral functional plasticity associated with learning of a specific sequence of visually-guided joystick movements (sequence task) over six days of training. On the first and last training days, we acquired high-resolution functional images of the brain and cervical cord simultaneously, while participants practiced the sequence or a random task while electromyography was recorded from wrist muscles. After six days of training, the subjects' motor performance improved in the sequence compared to the control condition. These behavioral changes were associated with decreased co-contractions and increased reciprocal activations between antagonist wrist muscles. Importantly, early learning was characterized by activation in the C8 level, whereas a more rostral activation in the C6-C7 was found during the later learning phase. Motor sequence learning was also supported by increased spinal cord functional connectivity with distinct brain networks, including the motor cortex, superior parietal lobule, and the cerebellum at the early stage, and the angular gyrus and cerebellum at a later stage of learning. Our results suggest that the early vs. late shift in spinal activation from caudal to rostral cervical segments synchronized with distinct brain networks, including parietal and cerebellar regions, is related to progressive changes reflecting the increasing fine control of wrist muscles during motor sequence learning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".