MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4221049156 · doi:10.1002/essoar.10510919.1

Total Least Squares Bias when Explanatory Variables are Correlated

2022· preprint· en· W4221049156 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical and numerical algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreprintComputer scienceStatisticsEconometricsMathematicsWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Total Least Squares (TLS) or orthogonal regression is used to remedy attenuation bias in optimal fingerprinting regressions. Consistency properties in multivariate applications require strong assumptions about unobservable variance ratios. Monte Carlo analysis is used herein to examine coefficient biases when the explanatory variables are correlated and have heterogeneous error variances. Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) exhibits the expected attenuation bias patterns which vanish as the noise variances on the explanatory variable disappear. TLS is generally more biased than OLS except under homogeneous noise variances. When the explanatory variables are negatively correlated TLS imparts a large upward bias which gets worse as the noise variance on the explanatory variable gets smaller. In general without specific diagnostic information TLS should not be considered an improvement on OLS and can yield extremely biased coefficients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.575
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStatistical and numerical algorithmsFrench-language works237,207