Synthesis, structural evolution, and dielectric properties of a new perovskite solid solution (Pb <sub>0.5</sub> Sr <sub>0.5</sub> )(Zr <sub>0.5</sub> Ti <sub>0.5</sub> )O <sub>3</sub> –PbTiO <sub>3</sub>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract To explore lead‐reduced dielectric materials in the SrTiO 3 –PbTiO 3 –PbZrO 3 ternary system, a novel solid solution between relaxor ferroelectric (Pb 0.5 Sr 0.5 )(Zr 0.5 Ti 0.5 )O 3 and ferroelectric PbTiO 3 , namely (1 − x )(Pb 0.5 Sr 0.5 ) (Zr 0.5 Ti 0.5 )O 3 – x PbTiO 3 (lead–strontium–zirconate–titanate [PSZT]–PT), has been synthesized in the perovskite structure by high‐temperature solid‐state reaction method in the form of ceramics. The crystal structure and phase symmetry of the materials synthesized were analyzed and resolved based on X‐ray powder diffraction (XRD) data through both the Pawley and Rietveld refinements. The results of the structural refinements indicate that at low PT‐concentration end of the solid solution system, for example, x = 0.05, the PSZT–PT solid solution exhibits a cubic structural symmetry (with the space group Pm ‐3 m ). As the PT concentration ( x ) increases, the structure of (1 − x )PSZT– x PT gradually transforms from the cubic to a tetragonal ( P 4 mm ) phase. In the composition range of x = 0.10–0.25, a mixture of the cubic and tetragonal phases was identified. As the concentration of PT increases, the proportion of the tetragonal phase increases at the expense of the cubic phase. For a composition of x > 0.25, a pure tetragonal phase is observed. The dielectric properties of the materials were studied by measuring the permittivity as a function of temperature at various frequencies. For the composition of x = 0.05, the temperature dependence of dielectric constant shows typical relaxor behavior. For x = 0.35, the dielectric peaks indicate a normal ferroelectric phase transition. Overall, a structural transformation from a central‐symmetric, nonpolar cubic phase to a non‐centrosymmetric, polar tetragonal phase is induced by the substitution of PT for PSZT in the pseudo‐binary solid solution of (1 − x )PSZT– x PT, which also reveals an interesting relaxor to ferroelectric crossover phenomenon.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".