MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4221055834 · doi:10.2118/208919-ms

The Effects of Asphaltene Precipitation on Bitumen Recovery during Non-Thermal Cyclic Solvent Injection in Cold Lake Oil Sands- An Experimental Study

2022· article· en· W4221055834 on OpenAlexaff
Lin Yuan, Mohammad Yousefi, Hassan Dehghanpour

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsphaltenePropaneAsphaltOil sandsSolventDistillationHydrocarbonExtraction (chemistry)Steam injectionPrecipitationMaterials scienceChemical engineeringVapor pressurePetroleum engineeringChemistryChromatographyGeologyComposite materialOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The non-thermal solvent-based processes for bitumen extraction consume less energy and water, and thus, have less impacts on the environment compared with the steam-based thermal processes. The objective of this paper is to investigate the mechanisms responsible for propane transport into and bitumen production from oil-sand core samples during the cyclic solvent injection (CSI). We use a state-of-the-art high-pressure and high-temperature (HPHT) visualization cell to investigate non-equilibrium propane-bitumen interactions during CSI. We inject propane into the cell containing a bitumen-saturated core plug representing in-situ reservoir conditions. Three sets of tests with different propane vapor (C3(v)) to liquid (C3(l)) ratio are conducted (set 1 with C3(l), set 2 with C3(l)-C3(v) mixture, and set 3 with C3(v)). After the CSI tests, the final bitumen recovery factor is calculated by the weight-balance method and the precipitated asphaltene content caused by propane-bitumen interactions is also measured using a distillation apparatus. When the core is fully immersed in C3(l), the cell pressure rapidly declines during the early soaking process, and then, it declines gradually. However, no obvious pressure decline can be observed when C3(v) is present in the system. This can be explained by the higher compressibility of C3(v) compared to C3(l), leading to a less significant pressure decline during the soaking period. A light hydrocarbon phase is produced from the core at the end of the depletion process, indicating the extraction of light components of oil by propane even at low-temperature conditions. The bitumen recovery factor is the lowest (11.93%) in set 1 when the core is soaked in C3(l), while that is the highest (14.73%) in set 3 when the core is soaked in C3(v). Also, the bitumen production stops quickly at the early soaking period in set 1. This is because asphaltene precipitation is more significant when the C3(l) is present in the system. The propane density in liquid state is higher than that in vapor state, leading to more bitumen-propane interactions and more asphaltene precipitation. The precipitated asphaltene blocks the pore network and inhibits bitumen production. Our results show that increasing C3(v) to C3(v) ratio decreases the amount of asphaltene precipitation, and in turn, increases bitumen recovery factor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPetroleum Processing and Analysis→French-language works237,207→