MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4221066289 · doi:10.3390/aerospace9030160

A Multidisciplinary Possibilistic Approach to Size the Empennage of Multi-Engine Propeller-Driven Light Aircraft

2022· article· en· W4221066289 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAerospace · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAdvanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersMitacs
KeywordsAirworthinessAirframePropellerSizingPropulsionMultidisciplinary design optimizationAerodynamicsStability (learning theory)ControllabilityLongitudinal static stabilityComputer scienceFlight envelopeFlight control surfacesAerospace engineeringEngineeringControl engineeringMultidisciplinary approachMarine engineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In considering aircraft design, it is very important to effectively size the tail configuration for stability and control. Multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) focuses on the use of numerical optimization in the design of systems with multiple subsystems or disciplines of consideration. However, MDO uses deterministic calculations, and does not consider the uncertainties that arise from the employed analyses, including errors due to linearization and simplification. For problems with inadequate input data, the possibility-based design optimization (PBDO) scheme can be implemented in its stead to achieve reliable designs using membership functions for epistemic uncertainties. A multidisciplinary, possibilistic approach is presented to define the sizing of the empennage configuration of a twin-engine propeller-driven aircraft by changing shape parameters while satisfying the design requirements given the tailless aircraft configuration, the flight conditions, and various uncertainties. The corresponding disciplines are aerodynamics, stability and control, propulsion and weight and balance. Herein, different design requirements are considered including longitudinal/lateral/directional trim and stability characteristics, manufacturing and controllability criteria, handling qualities, operational requirements, airworthiness and survivability. The resulting aerodynamic characteristics and flight dynamic stability outcomes show that the optimized tail configuration for the proposed aircraft fully complied with airworthiness requirements and predefined constraints while considering several uncertainties due to the use of early-stage statistical estimations. The proposed approach can be used to enhance the preliminary design of multi-engine propeller-driven light aircraft where only low-fidelity, statistical estimations are available. The resulting output is not only an optimized aircraft configuration, but one where the stability of the design has been ensured. In this work, the aerodynamic characteristics have been determined using a validated semi-empirical program called MAPLA, developed for light aircraft designs and development in the preliminary design phase. Furthermore, the optimization framework consists of a deterministic optimizer that runs sequentially with a possibility assessment algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.418
Threshold uncertainty score0.706

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it