MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4221067649 · doi:10.1016/j.jadr.2022.100348

Understanding the impact of COVID-19 isolation measures on individuals with mood disorders in mental health clinics

2022· article· en· W4221067649 on OpenAlexaff
Carolina Alves Rodrigues, Scott B. Patten, EE Smith, Pamela Roach

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Affective Disorders Reports · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCOVID-19 and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Population and Public HealthHotchkiss Brain InstituteOntario Brain InstituteUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMoodCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Mood disordersIsolation (microbiology)Mental healthPsychiatryTelepsychiatryMental health carePsychology2019-20 coronavirus outbreakHealth careSocial isolationMedicineTelemedicineClinical psychologyAnxietyVirologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Participants adapted well to virtual psychiatric care. • Concerns over virtual care stemmed from meeting a new care practitioner through virtual care. • Individuals with mood disorders were able to manage their conditions well in the first wave of COVID-19.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.068
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.068
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Affective Disorders ReportsSame topicCOVID-19 and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207