Iron oxide chemistry supports a multistage hydrothermal genesis of BIF-hosted hematite ore in the Mt. Tom Price and Mt. Whaleback deposits
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study demonstrates the great value of iron oxide chemistry in low-temperature systems. Hematite records elemental signatures of structural control, partial inheritance of pre-existing alteration, and allows chemical fingerprinting of multistage BIF-hosted ore. Mt. Whaleback and Mt. Tom Price are Western Australia’s largest banded iron formation (BIF) hosted hematite ore deposits. The mechanisms and timing of iron enrichment from BIF (with ∼20–40 wt% Fe) to high-grade iron ore (with up to 69 wt% Fe) are still controversially debated. In-situ iron oxide chemistry support post-metamorphic, structurally controlled, hydrothermal hematite ore formation via multiple stages of hydrothermally altered BIF. Iron oxides in two hydrothermal alteration zones in BIF at Mt. Tom Price (distal alteration assemblages: magnetite-siderite-stilpnomelane ± pyrite and intermediate alteration assemblages: hematite-magnetite-ankerite-chlorite) show similar trace element patterns that are distinct from metamorphic magnetite in least-altered magnetite-quartz ± hematite ± Fe-carbonate ± Fe-silicates BIF. At Mt. Whaleback, the hydrothermal alteration is completely eradicated by subsequent microplaty-martite hematite ore formation, and solely recorded in hematite composition by the inheritance of various conservative element abundances. Petrographically indistinct zones within a given orebody are chemically distinct and demonstrate formation via contrasting structurally controlled hydrothermal fluid flow: At Mt. Whaleback, specifically in the vicinity of Central Fault and Whaleback Fault, systematic trace element group abundance trends are recorded: major controls are fO2, pH, and acquired country rock signatures, i.e., evolved (Al, Mn, Mo, Pb, U) at Central Fault, and primitive (Al, Cr, Ti, V, Cu, Ni, Co) at Whaleback fault. Complex zoned growth textures and element distribution in microplaty hematite support precipitation during protracted hydrothermal fluid/rock interaction. In combination, our results falsify the importance of alternative hematite crystallisation models, including goethite dehydration and coalescent nanoparticles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".