MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Iron oxide chemistry supports a multistage hydrothermal genesis of BIF-hosted hematite ore in the Mt. Tom Price and Mt. Whaleback deposits

2022· article· en· W4221068646 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas Angerer, Warren Thorne, Steffen G. Hagemann, Martina Tribus, Noreen J. Evans, Dany Savard

Bibliographic record

VenueOre Geology Reviews · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHematiteBanded iron formationGeologyMagnetiteGeochemistryHydrothermal circulationSideritePyriteAnkeriteMineralMineralogyIron oreTrace elementOre genesisIron oxide copper gold ore depositsIron oxideFluid inclusionsSedimentary rockChemistryMetallurgyMaterials sciencePaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study demonstrates the great value of iron oxide chemistry in low-temperature systems. Hematite records elemental signatures of structural control, partial inheritance of pre-existing alteration, and allows chemical fingerprinting of multistage BIF-hosted ore. Mt. Whaleback and Mt. Tom Price are Western Australia’s largest banded iron formation (BIF) hosted hematite ore deposits. The mechanisms and timing of iron enrichment from BIF (with ∼20–40 wt% Fe) to high-grade iron ore (with up to 69 wt% Fe) are still controversially debated. In-situ iron oxide chemistry support post-metamorphic, structurally controlled, hydrothermal hematite ore formation via multiple stages of hydrothermally altered BIF. Iron oxides in two hydrothermal alteration zones in BIF at Mt. Tom Price (distal alteration assemblages: magnetite-siderite-stilpnomelane ± pyrite and intermediate alteration assemblages: hematite-magnetite-ankerite-chlorite) show similar trace element patterns that are distinct from metamorphic magnetite in least-altered magnetite-quartz ± hematite ± Fe-carbonate ± Fe-silicates BIF. At Mt. Whaleback, the hydrothermal alteration is completely eradicated by subsequent microplaty-martite hematite ore formation, and solely recorded in hematite composition by the inheritance of various conservative element abundances. Petrographically indistinct zones within a given orebody are chemically distinct and demonstrate formation via contrasting structurally controlled hydrothermal fluid flow: At Mt. Whaleback, specifically in the vicinity of Central Fault and Whaleback Fault, systematic trace element group abundance trends are recorded: major controls are fO2, pH, and acquired country rock signatures, i.e., evolved (Al, Mn, Mo, Pb, U) at Central Fault, and primitive (Al, Cr, Ti, V, Cu, Ni, Co) at Whaleback fault. Complex zoned growth textures and element distribution in microplaty hematite support precipitation during protracted hydrothermal fluid/rock interaction. In combination, our results falsify the importance of alternative hematite crystallisation models, including goethite dehydration and coalescent nanoparticles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.743
Threshold uncertainty score0.726

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOre Geology ReviewsSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207