MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4221069163 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu22-7858

Morphometric fingerprinting of submarine canyon and channel processes revealed by time-lapse bathymetric surveys from the Congo Fan

2022· preprint· en· W4221069163 on OpenAlexaff
Martin Hasenhündl, Koen Blanckaert, Peter J. Talling, Ed Pope, Maarten Heijnen, Sean Ruffell, Megan L. Baker, Ricardo Silva Jacinto, Sophie Hage, Stephen M. Simmons, Catharina Heerema, Claire McGhee, Michael Clare, Matthieu Cartigny

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBathymetryGeologyCanyonChannel (broadcasting)Submarine canyonSubmarineSeafloor spreadingSubmarine pipelineSubmarine landslideOceanographyGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Submarine canyons and channels include the largest sediment transport systems on our planet. They are an important transport pathway for sediment, organic carbon, nutrients and pollutants to the deep sea. However, it is challenging to study these submarine locations, especially larger systems on the deep seafloor, and they remain poorly understood. Here we use the first extensive time-lapse bathymetric surveys of the Congo Submarine Fan (offshore West Africa), one of the largest submarine fans in the world. Channel-modifying processes (such as landslides, avulsions and knickpoints) are identified by comparing new high-resolution bathymetric data from 2019 to lower-resolution bathymetric data collected between 1992 and 1998, along a 475 km section of the Congo submarine system. These channel-modifying processes leave a specific fingerprint in morphometric characteristics (e.g., bed slope, width, cross-sectional flow area, sinuosity, levee slope and height) that are automatically extracted with a Matlab script from the bathymetric data. This work has the important implication that the identification of channel-modifying processes can be based on a single bathymetric survey, and does not require repeated surveys. In the upstream part of the Congo Canyon, a re-analysis of bathymetric data collected between 1992 and 1998 reveals a previously unnoticed channel-blocking landslide, which is of similar magnitude to a more recent landslide observed from the repeated surveys with a volume of ~0.4 km³. This observation of additional landslides supports the concept that the upstream canyon is morphologically defined by flank collapses, which can locally block the channel and store material for extended periods of time. In the intermediate channel part of the Congo Fan, avulsions already identified in previous work are demonstrated to leave a specific fingerprint within the morphometric characteristics such as a change in levee slope. In the most distal and youngest part of the Congo submarine channel, upstream migrating knickpoints are dominant and are shown to also leave a specific fingerprint in morphometric characteristics. These findings can underpin efficient searches for submarine canyon and channel processes in other systems, and provide new insights into how turbidity currents flush sediment into the deep-sea.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.190

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological formations and processes→French-language works237,207→