Novice Faculty Members' Empowerment and Practicing Their Professional Roles in Light of the Administrative Methods in the Jordanian Universities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed to identify the level of novice faculty members' empowerment and practicing their professional roles in light of the administrative methods in the Jordanian universities based on some variables. The study sample consisted of (49) faculty members. The results showed that university management methods, novice faculty members' empowerment, and their professional roles were moderate. Furthermore, there were statistically significant differences in the level of faculty members' empowerment in light of gender, in favor of females, and in light of age, in favor of less than 30 years. The study results also showed a statistically significant difference in the level of faculty members' professional roles in light of age, in favor of 30 to less than 45 years. There was a statistically significant positive correlation between the democratic method and faculty members’ empowerment and their professional roles and a statistically significant negative correlation between non-interference and autocratic methods and faculty members’ empowerment and professional roles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".