MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4221069928 · doi:10.1002/cb.2051

Consumer matching costs to context: Status quo bias, temporal framing, and household energy decisions

2022· article· en· W4221069928 on OpenAlex
Carrie Gill, Stephen Atlas, David J. Hardisty, Shawn P. Scott

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Consumer Behaviour · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Education and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsStatus quoFraming (construction)Framing effectStatus quo biasEnergy (signal processing)Cognitive biasPsychologyEconomicsCognitionPublic economicsSocial psychologyPersuasionEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract One challenge of promoting energy‐efficient behavior change is status quo bias: consumers are reluctant to change away from their current level of energy usage, even if their energy usage is higher than they would actively choose. Using experimental data, this article examines what temporal frame minimizes status quo bias and encourages energy‐efficient behavioral intentions. The authors find that individuals make the most energy efficient decisions when presented with a monthly framing because they are more easily able to think about monthly costs than daily or yearly costs. The authors investigate whether cognitive fluency could be an underlying mechanism, and find evidence that individuals are most fluent when energy costs are framed on a monthly basis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.180
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it