MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4221070204 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu22-4211

Long lasting greenhouse gas emissions beyond abrupt permafrost thaw event in permafrost peatlands

2022· preprint· en· W4221070204 on OpenAlexaff
Hanna Lee, Casper T. Christiansen, Inge Althuizen, Anders Michelsen, Peter Dörsch, Sebastian Westermann, David Risk

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPermafrostPeatEnvironmental scienceMireGreenhouse gasSphagnumThermokarstPlateau (mathematics)Vegetation (pathology)Carbon cycleHydrology (agriculture)Soil carbonEcosystemSoil waterEcologySoil scienceGeologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abrupt permafrost thawing is expected to release large amounts of greenhouse gasses to the atmosphere, creating a positive feedback to climate warming. There is, however, still large uncertainty in the timing, duration, magnitude, and mechanisms controlling this process, which hampers accurate quantification of permafrost carbon climate feedback cycles. The current understanding supports that abrupt permafrost thaw will lead to surface inundation and create anaerobic landscapes, which dominantly produce methane during the decomposition process. Over time, natural succession and vegetation growth may decrease methane release and increase net carbon uptake. We investigated how rapid permafrost thawing and subsequent natural succession over time affect CO2, CH4, and N2O release at a field site in northern Norway (69ᵒN), where recent abrupt degradation of permafrost created thaw ponds in palsa peat plateau-mire ecosystems. The site exhibits a natural gradient of permafrost thaw, which also corresponds to a strong hydrological gradient (i.e. dry peat plateau underlain by intact permafrost, seasonally inundated thaw slumps, thaw ponds, and natural succession ponds covered by sphagnum and sedges). Since 2017, we used a range of manual and automated techniques to measure changes in vegetation, soil and water microclimate, biogeochemistry, and soil CO2, CH4, and N2O concentrations and fluxes across the permafrost thaw gradient. In the three-year observations, we show that abrupt permafrost thaw and land surface subsidence – both intermediate slumping and pond formation – increase net annual carbon loss. Permafrost thaw accelerated CO2 release greatly in thaw slumps (177.5 gCO2 m-2) compared to intact permafrost peat plateau (59.0 gCO2 m-2). During the growing season, peat plateau was a small sink of atmospheric CH4 (-2.5 gCH4 m-2), whereas permafrost thaw slumping and pond formation increased CH4 release dramatically (ranging from 9.7 to 36.1 gCH4 m-2). Furthermore, CH4 release continues to increase even in natural succession pond likely due to aerenchyma transport of CH4 from deeper soil. The overall N2O release was negligeable except in the bare soil peat plateau. The net radiative forcing of ecosystem carbon balance will depend on the carbon uptake from the natural succession of vegetation, but we show that greenhouse gas emissions continue to increase beyond abrupt permafrost thaw event towards natural succession.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClimate change and permafrost→French-language works237,207→