The Imperative of Engendering an Egalitarian Legal Framework for the Protection of Female Employees’ Rights in Nigeria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This article through doctrinal approach, examines both international and domestic legal frameworks (International Labour Organization Equal Remuneration Convention 1951, Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) Convention 1958, Maternity Protection Convention 1952, Beijing Declaration, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948, African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights, 1988, Protocol to the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights on the Right of Women in Africa, Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination against Women, 1999 Constitution, Employee Compensation Act, etc that protect female employees rights in Nigeria. It discusses “right” and general employees’ rights in Nigeria howbeit tangentially. It discusses Nigeria’s female employees’ rights and evaluates the laws on general employees’ rights and found that, the vulnerability and peculiarities of female employees, precipitated by their multiple roles in not well recognized and protected under Nigerian labour law when compared with international instrument. It makes vital recommendations on way forward.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".